By Anna Bensemann Senior Planner, Baseline Group | Nov 22, 2022
There is a general shift in New Zealand legislation to better honour the partnership principles between the Crown and Iwi, embodied in the Treaty of Waitangi. This is distinctly apparent in recent planning-based legislation changes under the Resource Management Act (RMA). Central Government driven National Policy Statements (NPS) for both fresh water and highly productive soils illustrate this fundamental change and arguably have directed some of the most significant changes to compliance measures for modern farming.
New fundamental concepts such as Te Mana o te Wai have been introduced to provide an overarching direction for how fresh water is managed. This concept recognises the vital importance of water and looks to protect the health and well-being of freshwater, seeking to prioritise the health of waterways before human drinking water, and before more commercial uses of water such as irrigation. This concept requires integrated management of freshwater bodies using the concept of ki uta ki tai (from the mountains to the sea).
Co-governance is another key direction promoted by Central Government to enable Tangata Whenua engagement and influence in the decision-making process. There is a real potential for a disconnect to occur where an obligation to actively involve Tangata Whenua in decision making is not supported with funding and resources to make such consultation meaningful. With the RMA largely a user pays system, it has traditionally resulted in applicants having to fund consultation with Iwi, often creating animosity between Iwi and resource consent applicants. This is seen as a significant barrier to development and creates a clear wedge in otherwise small communities.
As with any new piece of legislation, there are different ways of interpretingthese new concepts and requirements. Each Regional and District Council interprets their obligations differently, leading to inconsistent administration and often inconsistent outcomes between regions and districts. There will be some standardisation to interpretations when these concepts are tested through
Environment Court proceedings. Case law decisions tend to take ten plus years to emerge due to the slower processing timeframes for court proceedings. The formal process of litigation is also not for everyone, with deep pockets required to fund the legal system and a greater risk of being turned down.
In the meantime, Councils, Planners, Iwi and farmers alike will have to grapple with what these new concepts and rules will mean on the ground. The real opportunity is to ensure Mahi Tahi (to work together as one) occurs when it counts, to secure a healthy and prosperous environment for all parties involved, including for generations to come.
Articles you might be interested in
- A recent Baseline Group project was recognised at the 2022 Canterbury Architecture Awards
- Rural allotment sizes set to double in West Selwyn
- But that’s the way we have always done it!
- Changes to Resource Management Planning Signalled in Proposed Legislation
- Have your say on Development Projects
- Rural Allotment Sizes set to Double
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan Update
- Crunch Time For New Freshwater Legislation
- Planning Permissions – Resource Consent or Plan Change?
- How might Development Contributions affect you?
- Managing Cultural Heritage Sites
- RMA changes are coming, are you ready?
- Minimum Car Parking Requirements to be Chopped
- Is the RMA really the problem?
- The impact of consent notices when purchasing land
- Hazardous activities, land contamination and resource consent applications
- The dream of subdividing your land
- Housing Growth continues in Selwyn with Legislative Support
- Indigenous Biodiversity: what does it mean for a farmer?
- Is it a Wetland or Not?
- The Role of Planning in the Climate Change - Discussion for Agriculture
- Tiny Home Revolution May Not Save Costs
- Boundary disputes – What are they and how can you resolve them?
- A Practical Guide for District Plan Reviews
- Selwyn District Council Changes Urban Allotment Sizes
- Make Your Additional Land Profitable Under the Selwyn Proposed Plan
- State highways, noise and reverse sensitivity: what’s the buzz?
- Minimum car parking requirements to be chopped
- Who Shapes our Planning Rules?
- What to do when you inherit land
- Game changers for housing under the RMA
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan - What next?
- District Plan in Selwyn – How will it Affect You?
- Cross lease titles - an overview
- Change isn't coming, it's here!
- The importance of knowing your boundaries
- Planning land use to be resilient to natural hazards
- How lizards might affect your new development
- Why we have complicated septic tank disposal rules
- Wild Weather and Resource Consent Requirements
- Commercial Activity in a Rural Zone – What’s the Harm?
- Risks to farmland in the planning framework
- Negotiating with Neighbours Under the RMA
- Spotlight on District Plan Provisions
- Highly Productive Soils – Big Picture Thinking vs Private Landowners Needs
- Housing Intensification – Not for Everyone Says CCC
- Who Pays for Infrastructure in Greenfield Land Development?
- Outstanding Natural Features and Landscapes - effect on farming
- Planning Rules can Affect Property Value
- The Great Forestry Debate
- What does a professional planner do?
- Time's up on the RMA
- Highly Productive Soils – Big Picture Thinking vs Private Landowners Needs
- Buildings under exemptions may still need resource consent
- Good District Plan provisions save time and money