By Anna Bensemann, Senior Planner, Baseline Group Marlborough | Jun 26, 2022
The expansion of our towns and cities, and our ever-growing obsession with rural lifestyle blocks has been threatening the viability of our productive soils for many decades. The Resource Management Act includes some tools for protecting this land from development, but these tools are often given lip service in light of the pressures to develop, leading to the slow and steady degradation of our key versatile soils.
On the other hand, individual land owners invest time and money into their land, sometimes across multiple generations. With variable economic times, some landowners need the ability to subdivide and sell to the market land that is marginal, or no longer required. Such ability facilitates innovation and technological advancement on the balance of many properties, or simply enables a happy retirement.
This balance is being tested by the proposed National Policy Statement (NPS) relating to Class 1, 2 and 3 land and possibly other productive vineyard lands. The proposal includes regulations as to the expansion of urban activities onto this land, and the subdivision or further fragment land that is considered to be highly productive.
The implications of this are that private land containing highly valuable soils, which make up 14% of New Zealand, will have an additional matter that will need to be considered at the time of any subdivision or development. As seen with the NPS on freshwater, these documents carry a significant amount of weight and should not be taken lightly. The NPS on freshwater has seen regional councils limiting how much water is available for irrigation and making the resource consents process more complicated, with layers of additional reporting and investigations into the effects of water takes and discharges on water bodies.
The NPS for highly productive soils appears on the face of it to be ensuring we have a farming industry secured into the future, but like any government lead policy the devil will be in the detail. The real issues will arise when the policy is implemented by local government on a case by case basis. Policies that are written for the big picture often overlook the site specific unique features or anomalies that mean private landowners should be able to further develop their Class 1, 2 or 3 lands.
Government received around 250 submissions on the draft NPS, and decisions on submissions are due soon after 22 July 2022. We will see the full extent of the outcome of this process in due course as rural landowners look to develop their land.
Articles you might be interested in
- Councils are Increasing Residential Density, but why, who does it benefit?
- Is the RMA really the problem?
- Crime Prevention Through Environment Design (CPTED)
- Good District Plan provisions save time and money
- Have your say on Development Projects
- But that’s the way we have always done it!
- The Role of Planning in the Climate Change - Discussion for Agriculture
- RMA changes are coming, are you ready?
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan Update
- Why we have complicated septic tank disposal rules
- Burning crop stubble on your property?
- Who Pays for Infrastructure in Greenfield Land Development?
- Housing Growth continues in Selwyn with Legislative Support
- Planning land use to be resilient to natural hazards
- Make Your Additional Land Profitable Under the Selwyn Proposed Plan
- How might Development Contributions affect you?
- Game changers for housing under the RMA
- Time's up on the RMA
- Is it a Wetland or Not?
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan - What next?
- The dream of subdividing your land
- What does a professional planner do?
- Fundamental Culture Shift in New Zealand Planning Legislation.
- A recent Baseline Group project was recognised at the 2022 Canterbury Architecture Awards
- Commercial Activity in a Rural Zone – What’s the Harm?
- Rural Allotment Sizes set to Double
- Outstanding Natural Features and Landscapes - effect on farming
- What to do when you inherit land
- Changes to Resource Management Planning Signalled in Proposed Legislation
- How lizards might affect your new development
- Rural allotment sizes set to double in West Selwyn
- Selwyn District Council Changes Urban Allotment Sizes
- Negotiating with Neighbours Under the RMA
- Minimum car parking requirements to be chopped
- New Indigenous Biodiversity Legislation Mandates Significant Natural Area Identification
- A Practical Guide for District Plan Reviews
- Wild Weather and Resource Consent Requirements
- Changes to Flood Management in Selwyn
- Our History - How We All Play a Part in its Protection
- Planning Permissions – Resource Consent or Plan Change?
- The impact of consent notices when purchasing land
- Tiny Home Revolution May Not Save Costs
- The Great Forestry Debate
- Hazardous activities, land contamination and resource consent applications
- Highly Productive Soils – Big Picture Thinking vs Private Landowners Needs
- State highways, noise and reverse sensitivity: what’s the buzz?
- Planning Rules can Affect Property Value
- Housing Intensification – Not for Everyone Says CCC
- Change isn't coming, it's here!
- Risks to farmland in the planning framework
- Balancing Common Sense and Legal Process under the RMA: Protecting Communities and the Environment
- Historic Heritage Challenges for Landowners
- District Plan in Selwyn – How will it Affect You?
- Managing Cultural Heritage Sites
- Crunch Time For New Freshwater Legislation
- Minimum Car Parking Requirements to be Chopped
- How Tree Canopies Transform Neighbourhoods and Enhance Lives
- With increasing density, good design matters
- Spotlight on District Plan Provisions
- Your Rights as an Affected Neighbour: Navigating Development Under the RMA
- Boundary disputes – What are they and how can you resolve them?
- Who Shapes our Planning Rules?
- The importance of knowing your boundaries
- Buildings under exemptions may still need resource consent
- Indigenous Biodiversity: what does it mean for a farmer?
- Cross lease titles - an overview