By Anna Bensemann, Senior Planner, Baseline Group | Nov 15, 2022
The expansion of our towns and cities, and our ever growing obsession with rural lifestyle blocks has been threatening the viability of our productive soils for many decades. The Resource Management Act includes some tools for protecting this land from development, but these tools are often given lip service in light of the pressures to develop, leading to the slow and steady degradation of our key versatile soils.
On the other hand, individual landowners invest time and money into their land, sometimes across multiple generations. With variable economic times, some landowners need the ability to subdivide and sell to the market land that is marginal or no longer required. Such ability facilitates innovation and technological advancement on the balance of many properties, or simply enables a happy retirement.
This balance is being tested by the now operative National Policy Statement (NPS) relating to Class 1, 2 and 3 land and possibly other productive rural land. The proposal includes regulations as to the expansion of urban activities onto this land, and the subdivision or further fragmentation of land that is considered to be highly productive.
The implications of this are that private land containing highly valuable soils, which make up 14% of New Zealand, will have an additional matter that will need to be considered at the time of any subdivision or development. As seen with the NPS on freshwater, these documents carry a significant amount of weight and should not be taken lightly. The NPS on freshwater has seen regional Councils limiting how much water is available for irrigation and making the resource consent process more complicated with layers of additional reporting and investigations into the effects of water takes and discharges on water bodies.
The NPS for highly productive soils appears on the face of it to be ensuring we have a farming industry secured into the future, but like any government lead policy, the devil is in the detail. And the real issues will arise when the policy is implemented by local government on a case by case basis. Policies that are written for the big picture often overlook the site specific unique features or anomalies that mean private landowners should be able to further develop their Class 1, 2 or 3 lands.
With the new provisions now in effect, the question will be how much more expense will this generate to demonstrate the highly productive value of land, or whether these values will not be lost through the development process.
Articles you might be interested in
- Indigenous Biodiversity: what does it mean for a farmer?
- RMA changes are coming, are you ready?
- Housing Growth continues in Selwyn with Legislative Support
- Minimum car parking requirements to be chopped
- Our History - How We All Play a Part in its Protection
- Planning Rules can Affect Property Value
- Rural Allotment Sizes set to Double
- What to do when you inherit land
- District Plan in Selwyn – How will it Affect You?
- Buildings under exemptions may still need resource consent
- Outstanding Natural Features and Landscapes - effect on farming
- Highly Productive Soils – Big Picture Thinking vs Private Landowners Needs
- The Great Forestry Debate
- Burning crop stubble on your property?
- Planning land use to be resilient to natural hazards
- Who Shapes our Planning Rules?
- Crunch Time For New Freshwater Legislation
- Housing Intensification – Not for Everyone Says CCC
- Is it a Wetland or Not?
- Tiny Home Revolution May Not Save Costs
- The Role of Planning in the Climate Change - Discussion for Agriculture
- How lizards might affect your new development
- Why we have complicated septic tank disposal rules
- Negotiating with Neighbours Under the RMA
- State highways, noise and reverse sensitivity: what’s the buzz?
- Hazardous activities, land contamination and resource consent applications
- The dream of subdividing your land
- The impact of consent notices when purchasing land
- Is the RMA really the problem?
- What does a professional planner do?
- But that’s the way we have always done it!
- Councils are Increasing Residential Density, but why, who does it benefit?
- Spotlight on District Plan Provisions
- Balancing Common Sense and Legal Process under the RMA: Protecting Communities and the Environment
- Game changers for housing under the RMA
- Make Your Additional Land Profitable Under the Selwyn Proposed Plan
- Risks to farmland in the planning framework
- Boundary disputes – What are they and how can you resolve them?
- A recent Baseline Group project was recognised at the 2022 Canterbury Architecture Awards
- Time's up on the RMA
- Cross lease titles - an overview
- Have your say on Development Projects
- How might Development Contributions affect you?
- Wild Weather and Resource Consent Requirements
- The importance of knowing your boundaries
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan - What next?
- Commercial Activity in a Rural Zone – What’s the Harm?
- Changes to Resource Management Planning Signalled in Proposed Legislation
- Selwyn District Council Changes Urban Allotment Sizes
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan Update
- A Practical Guide for District Plan Reviews
- Change isn't coming, it's here!
- Who Pays for Infrastructure in Greenfield Land Development?
- Managing Cultural Heritage Sites
- Minimum Car Parking Requirements to be Chopped
- Fundamental Culture Shift in New Zealand Planning Legislation.
- Rural allotment sizes set to double in West Selwyn
- Planning Permissions – Resource Consent or Plan Change?
- Good District Plan provisions save time and money