By Anna Bensemann, Senior Planner Baseline Group Marlborough, Ph:0800 254 123 E:info@blg.nz | Dec 08, 2023
The right of access to and along the margins of rivers, lakes and the coastline by the public, is embedded in the Resource Management Act (RMA). District and Regional Councils are encouraged to provide and promote general public access to these spaces, for the amenity and wellbeing of all of our communities.
There is tension when an individual seeks to have sole occupancy of parts of this space for structures like boatsheds, jetties or whitebait stands, with the potential to create conflict between these users and the wider public. Further conflict can occur where erosion protection structures such as rip rap rock, or groynes are installed to protect private land from flooding or adverse weather, and this also restricts access to and along waterbodies.
Where individuals wish to have sole occupation of these public spaces, a resource consent is usually required to examine how much of the public space is sought to be occupied, the methods of construction and if use of the space is acceptable. In the case of jetties, often these are granted on the basis the presence of the structure does not restrict use by the wider public, although the owner remains responsible for the safety and maintenance of the jetties.
For people seeking to occupy public space the process of seeking a resource consent may seem onerous and is likely to include public notification of the application. For the wider public however, the removal of an inherent right of access to and along the margins of a waterbody has the potential to reduce the public enjoyment of these spaces, and the wider sense of community wellbeing by restricting access.
Without the process of notification, access to a waterbody might be restricted in a manner which decision makers were not aware would impact parts of the community. The process of public notification enables those who utilise the space currently to have their say on the impact to them. In many cases the occupancy of public space is unlikely to impact anyone, in which case the notification process may conclude with no submissions received.
However, there are cases where access may be restricted through a proposed occupation of public space which is not otherwise known to decision makers. This might include the use of a river a good fishing spot and a new structure preventing access to this spot. The submission process enables those users to express their concerns and often times leads to changes to the design or construction of structures in a manner which reduces the impact, or completely avoids it. This can result in a better outcome, ensuring the right of access is not diminished, and in some cases is enhanced.
For applicants, understanding use of public space is a privilege and not a right, enables practical solutions to ensure the best possible outcome is achieved for both the applicant and the wider public.
Articles you might be interested in
- State highways, noise and reverse sensitivity: what’s the buzz?
- Importance of Sediment Management in Land Development Projects: Simple Techniques for Effective Sediment Runoff Control
- Outstanding Natural Features and Landscapes - effect on farming
- Historic Heritage Challenges for Landowners
- Who Shapes our Planning Rules?
- How to navigate Rural Land Development Under the National Policy Statement on Highly Productive Soils
- Is the RMA really the problem?
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan - What next?
- Our History - How We All Play a Part in its Protection
- Crime Prevention Through Environment Design (CPTED)
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan Update
- How Tree Canopies Transform Neighbourhoods and Enhance Lives
- What does The Selwyn District Plan (appeals version) mean for the planning process and consent?
- Have your say on Development Projects
- Boundary disputes – What are they and how can you resolve them?
- Burning crop stubble on your property?
- Managing Cultural Heritage Sites
- Planning Permissions – Resource Consent or Plan Change?
- Rural Allotment Sizes set to Double
- Hazardous activities, land contamination and resource consent applications
- Managing Wastewater in Rural Canterbury: A Guide for Property Owners
- Buildings under exemptions may still need resource consent
- Balancing Common Sense and Legal Process under the RMA: Protecting Communities and the Environment
- Change isn't coming, it's here!
- Spotlight on District Plan Provisions
- Cross lease titles - an overview
- Housing Intensification – Not for Everyone Says CCC
- Planning land use to be resilient to natural hazards
- Make Your Additional Land Profitable Under the Selwyn Proposed Plan
- The impact of consent notices when purchasing land
- What does a professional planner do?
- Minimum Car Parking Requirements to be Chopped
- Minimum car parking requirements to be chopped
- Crunch Time For New Freshwater Legislation
- Tiny Home Revolution May Not Save Costs
- Negotiating with Neighbours Under the RMA
- The dream of subdividing your land
- The Great Forestry Debate
- Indigenous Biodiversity: what does it mean for a farmer?
- Wild Weather and Resource Consent Requirements
- New Indigenous Biodiversity Legislation Mandates Significant Natural Area Identification
- Is it a Wetland or Not?
- Fundamental Culture Shift in New Zealand Planning Legislation.
- Why we have complicated septic tank disposal rules
- The National Policy Statement for Natural Hazard Decision-Making and its effects on Resource Consents
- The importance of knowing your boundaries
- But that’s the way we have always done it!
- RMA changes are coming, are you ready?
- Good District Plan provisions save time and money
- A Practical Guide for District Plan Reviews
- What to do when you inherit land
- Time matters – With Resource Consent
- Navigating New Opportunities: The Importance of Land Development Planning in 2024
- Commercial Activity in a Rural Zone – What’s the Harm?
- Planning Rules can Affect Property Value
- The rise or fall of rural lifestyle blocks in the Selwyn District?
- Highly Productive Soils – Big Picture Thinking vs Private Landowners Needs
- Councils are Increasing Residential Density, but why, who does it benefit?
- Rural allotment sizes set to double in West Selwyn
- Game changers for housing under the RMA
- Who Pays for Infrastructure in Greenfield Land Development?
- Highly Productive Soils – Big Picture Thinking vs Private Landowners Needs
- Housing Growth continues in Selwyn with Legislative Support
- With increasing density, good design matters
- Selwyn District Council Changes Urban Allotment Sizes
- How lizards might affect your new development
- Your Rights as an Affected Neighbour: Navigating Development Under the RMA
- How might Development Contributions affect you?
- District Plan in Selwyn – How will it Affect You?
- Confused by Environmental Legislation? You are Not Alone.
- Time's up on the RMA
- A recent Baseline Group project was recognised at the 2022 Canterbury Architecture Awards
- Flood Management | Changes in Selwyn
- Changes to Resource Management Planning Signalled in Proposed Legislation
- The Role of Planning in the Climate Change - Discussion for Agriculture
- Risks to farmland in the planning framework