By Anna Bensemann, Senior Planner Baseline Group Marlborough, Ph:0800 254 123 E:info@blg.nz | Dec 08, 2023
The right of access to and along the margins of rivers, lakes and the coastline by the public, is embedded in the Resource Management Act (RMA). District and Regional Councils are encouraged to provide and promote general public access to these spaces, for the amenity and wellbeing of all of our communities.
There is tension when an individual seeks to have sole occupancy of parts of this space for structures like boatsheds, jetties or whitebait stands, with the potential to create conflict between these users and the wider public. Further conflict can occur where erosion protection structures such as rip rap rock, or groynes are installed to protect private land from flooding or adverse weather, and this also restricts access to and along waterbodies.
Where individuals wish to have sole occupation of these public spaces, a resource consent is usually required to examine how much of the public space is sought to be occupied, the methods of construction and if use of the space is acceptable. In the case of jetties, often these are granted on the basis the presence of the structure does not restrict use by the wider public, although the owner remains responsible for the safety and maintenance of the jetties.
For people seeking to occupy public space the process of seeking a resource consent may seem onerous and is likely to include public notification of the application. For the wider public however, the removal of an inherent right of access to and along the margins of a waterbody has the potential to reduce the public enjoyment of these spaces, and the wider sense of community wellbeing by restricting access.
Without the process of notification, access to a waterbody might be restricted in a manner which decision makers were not aware would impact parts of the community. The process of public notification enables those who utilise the space currently to have their say on the impact to them. In many cases the occupancy of public space is unlikely to impact anyone, in which case the notification process may conclude with no submissions received.
However, there are cases where access may be restricted through a proposed occupation of public space which is not otherwise known to decision makers. This might include the use of a river a good fishing spot and a new structure preventing access to this spot. The submission process enables those users to express their concerns and often times leads to changes to the design or construction of structures in a manner which reduces the impact, or completely avoids it. This can result in a better outcome, ensuring the right of access is not diminished, and in some cases is enhanced.
For applicants, understanding use of public space is a privilege and not a right, enables practical solutions to ensure the best possible outcome is achieved for both the applicant and the wider public.
Articles you might be interested in
- Submissions to a Resource Consent by Affected Parties
- Fundamental Culture Shift in New Zealand Planning Legislation.
- How might Development Contributions affect you?
- New Indigenous Biodiversity Legislation Mandates Significant Natural Area Identification
- Subdividing – The Basics
- Is it a Wetland or Not?
- Understanding Zoning and Density Rules in Selwyn
- Navigating New Opportunities: The Importance of Land Development Planning in 2024
- Build-to-Rent Development in New Zealand: A Rising Trend in Housing
- Crime Prevention Through Environment Design (CPTED)
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan - What next?
- Spotlight on District Plan Provisions
- A New Dawn for Granny Flats and Accessory Dwellings
- Time's up on the RMA
- Land Development opportunities and times of change
- Highly Productive Soils – Big Picture Thinking vs Private Landowners Needs
- Flood Management – An Update
- Have your say on Development Projects
- Balancing Common Sense and Legal Process under the RMA: Protecting Communities and the Environment
- Managing Wastewater in Rural Canterbury: A Guide for Property Owners
- Changes to Resource Management Planning Signalled in Proposed Legislation
- The Taking of Esplanades at the Time of Subdivision
- What does The Selwyn District Plan (appeals version) mean for the planning process and consent?
- Our History - How We All Play a Part in its Protection
- Minimum car parking requirements to be chopped
- Good District Plan provisions save time and money
- How Tree Canopies Transform Neighbourhoods and Enhance Lives
- Planning Permissions – Resource Consent or Plan Change?
- Rural Allotment Sizes set to Double
- Wild Weather and Resource Consent Requirements
- Make Your Additional Land Profitable Under the Selwyn Proposed Plan
- Importance of Sediment Management in Land Development Projects: Simple Techniques for Effective Sediment Runoff Control
- What does a professional planner do?
- Crunch Time For New Freshwater Legislation
- Councils are Increasing Residential Density, but why, who does it benefit?
- Game changers for housing under the RMA
- Going for housing growth, to improve housing affordability
- The Role of Planning in the Climate Change - Discussion for Agriculture
- The costs of subdividing hitting Selwyn | development contributions
- Historic Heritage Challenges for Landowners
- The Role of Planning in Land and Property Development
- With increasing density, good design matters
- How lizards might affect your new development
- Selwyn District Council Changes Urban Allotment Sizes
- Why we have complicated septic tank disposal rules
- Confused by Environmental Legislation? You are Not Alone.
- Planning land use to be resilient to natural hazards
- What to do when you inherit land
- Risks to farmland in the planning framework
- Minimum Car Parking Requirements to be Chopped
- The Great Forestry Debate
- Managing Cultural Heritage Sites
- Flood Management | Changes in Selwyn
- Change isn't coming, it's here!
- RMA changes are coming, are you ready?
- Tiny Home Revolution May Not Save Costs
- Highly Productive Soils – Big Picture Thinking vs Private Landowners Needs
- The National Policy Statement for Natural Hazard Decision-Making and its effects on Resource Consents
- Rural allotment sizes set to double in West Selwyn
- Your Rights as an Affected Neighbour: Navigating Development Under the RMA
- Cross Lease Titles
- Ensuring Compliance with Resource Management Laws
- The impact of consent notices when purchasing land
- But that’s the way we have always done it!
- Housing Growth continues in Selwyn with Legislative Support
- What does an activity status mean for your land development?
- Who Pays for Infrastructure in Greenfield Land Development?
- Back to Basics for the RMA Reforms
- Cross lease titles - an overview
- Outstanding Natural Features and Landscapes - effect on farming
- Time matters – With Resource Consent
- District Plan in Selwyn – How will it Affect You?
- Burning crop stubble on your property?
- The rise or fall of rural lifestyle blocks in the Selwyn District?
- Boundary disputes – What are they and how can you resolve them?
- Hazardous activities, land contamination and resource consent applications
- State highways, noise and reverse sensitivity: what’s the buzz?
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan Update
- A recent Baseline Group project was recognised at the 2022 Canterbury Architecture Awards
- What does your zone mean for you and your property?
- Buildings under exemptions may still need resource consent
- Is the RMA really the problem?
- The dream of subdividing your land
- Housing Intensification – Not for Everyone Says CCC
- Commercial Activity in a Rural Zone – What’s the Harm?
- The importance of knowing your boundaries
- Who Shapes our Planning Rules?
- A Practical Guide for District Plan Reviews
- Negotiating with Neighbours Under the RMA
- Indigenous Biodiversity: what does it mean for a farmer?
- How to navigate Rural Land Development Under the National Policy Statement on Highly Productive Soils
- Planning Rules can Affect Property Value