By Anna Bensemann, Senior Planner Baseline Group Marlborough, Ph:0800 254 123 E:info@blg.nz | Dec 08, 2023
The right of access to and along the margins of rivers, lakes and the coastline by the public, is embedded in the Resource Management Act (RMA). District and Regional Councils are encouraged to provide and promote general public access to these spaces, for the amenity and wellbeing of all of our communities.
There is tension when an individual seeks to have sole occupancy of parts of this space for structures like boatsheds, jetties or whitebait stands, with the potential to create conflict between these users and the wider public. Further conflict can occur where erosion protection structures such as rip rap rock, or groynes are installed to protect private land from flooding or adverse weather, and this also restricts access to and along waterbodies.
Where individuals wish to have sole occupation of these public spaces, a resource consent is usually required to examine how much of the public space is sought to be occupied, the methods of construction and if use of the space is acceptable. In the case of jetties, often these are granted on the basis the presence of the structure does not restrict use by the wider public, although the owner remains responsible for the safety and maintenance of the jetties.
For people seeking to occupy public space the process of seeking a resource consent may seem onerous and is likely to include public notification of the application. For the wider public however, the removal of an inherent right of access to and along the margins of a waterbody has the potential to reduce the public enjoyment of these spaces, and the wider sense of community wellbeing by restricting access.
Without the process of notification, access to a waterbody might be restricted in a manner which decision makers were not aware would impact parts of the community. The process of public notification enables those who utilise the space currently to have their say on the impact to them. In many cases the occupancy of public space is unlikely to impact anyone, in which case the notification process may conclude with no submissions received.
However, there are cases where access may be restricted through a proposed occupation of public space which is not otherwise known to decision makers. This might include the use of a river a good fishing spot and a new structure preventing access to this spot. The submission process enables those users to express their concerns and often times leads to changes to the design or construction of structures in a manner which reduces the impact, or completely avoids it. This can result in a better outcome, ensuring the right of access is not diminished, and in some cases is enhanced.
For applicants, understanding use of public space is a privilege and not a right, enables practical solutions to ensure the best possible outcome is achieved for both the applicant and the wider public.
Articles you might be interested in
- A New Dawn for Granny Flats and Accessory Dwellings
- Cross lease titles - an overview
- Buildings under exemptions may still need resource consent
- The Great Forestry Debate
- Highly Productive Soils – Big Picture Thinking vs Private Landowners Needs
- Ensuring Compliance with Resource Management Laws
- Build-to-Rent Development in New Zealand: A Rising Trend in Housing
- Councils are Increasing Residential Density, but why, who does it benefit?
- Selwyn District Council Changes Urban Allotment Sizes
- District Plan in Selwyn – How will it Affect You?
- What does The Selwyn District Plan (appeals version) mean for the planning process and consent?
- Cross Lease Titles
- The dream of subdividing your land
- Make Your Additional Land Profitable Under the Selwyn Proposed Plan
- But that’s the way we have always done it!
- Outstanding Natural Features and Landscapes - effect on farming
- Planning land use to be resilient to natural hazards
- Housing Intensification – Not for Everyone Says CCC
- Wild Weather and Resource Consent Requirements
- A recent Baseline Group project was recognised at the 2022 Canterbury Architecture Awards
- Highly Productive Soils – Big Picture Thinking vs Private Landowners Needs
- The Taking of Esplanades at the Time of Subdivision
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan - What next?
- Fundamental Culture Shift in New Zealand Planning Legislation.
- Time's up on the RMA
- Is it a Wetland or Not?
- Changes to Resource Management Planning Signalled in Proposed Legislation
- Submissions to a Resource Consent by Affected Parties
- Land Development opportunities and times of change
- Good District Plan provisions save time and money
- Flood Management | Changes in Selwyn
- Indigenous Biodiversity: what does it mean for a farmer?
- Hazardous activities, land contamination and resource consent applications
- How Tree Canopies Transform Neighbourhoods and Enhance Lives
- The impact of consent notices when purchasing land
- Game changers for housing under the RMA
- The Role of Planning in Land and Property Development
- Crunch Time For New Freshwater Legislation
- Spotlight on District Plan Provisions
- Boundary disputes – What are they and how can you resolve them?
- A Practical Guide for District Plan Reviews
- Who Pays for Infrastructure in Greenfield Land Development?
- Navigating New Opportunities: The Importance of Land Development Planning in 2024
- What to do when you inherit land
- Importance of Sediment Management in Land Development Projects: Simple Techniques for Effective Sediment Runoff Control
- Time matters – With Resource Consent
- Who Shapes our Planning Rules?
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan Update
- Risks to farmland in the planning framework
- Why we have complicated septic tank disposal rules
- How might Development Contributions affect you?
- Have your say on Development Projects
- With increasing density, good design matters
- Minimum Car Parking Requirements to be Chopped
- The National Policy Statement for Natural Hazard Decision-Making and its effects on Resource Consents
- Is the RMA really the problem?
- What does your zone mean for you and your property?
- Historic Heritage Challenges for Landowners
- Flood Management – An Update
- Rural allotment sizes set to double in West Selwyn
- Housing Growth continues in Selwyn with Legislative Support
- Going for housing growth, to improve housing affordability
- How to navigate Rural Land Development Under the National Policy Statement on Highly Productive Soils
- Your Rights as an Affected Neighbour: Navigating Development Under the RMA
- State highways, noise and reverse sensitivity: what’s the buzz?
- Minimum car parking requirements to be chopped
- Planning Permissions – Resource Consent or Plan Change?
- New Indigenous Biodiversity Legislation Mandates Significant Natural Area Identification
- The importance of knowing your boundaries
- Planning Rules can Affect Property Value
- Change isn't coming, it's here!
- The costs of subdividing hitting Selwyn | development contributions
- RMA changes are coming, are you ready?
- Subdividing – The Basics
- The Role of Planning in the Climate Change - Discussion for Agriculture
- What does an activity status mean for your land development?
- Rural Allotment Sizes set to Double
- Our History - How We All Play a Part in its Protection
- Burning crop stubble on your property?
- Tiny Home Revolution May Not Save Costs
- Managing Cultural Heritage Sites
- Commercial Activity in a Rural Zone – What’s the Harm?
- What does a professional planner do?
- Managing Wastewater in Rural Canterbury: A Guide for Property Owners
- How lizards might affect your new development
- Balancing Common Sense and Legal Process under the RMA: Protecting Communities and the Environment
- Confused by Environmental Legislation? You are Not Alone.
- The rise or fall of rural lifestyle blocks in the Selwyn District?
- Crime Prevention Through Environment Design (CPTED)
- Negotiating with Neighbours Under the RMA