By Anna Bensemann | Nov 10, 2020
The Resource Management Act (RMA) has come under fire since it came into force in 1991, with many governments tweaking its provisions in an effort to better protect our environment while streamlining development. It seems in an election year the RMA has come under fire once again with threats to scrap the system and start with new legislation.
One option presented by our politicians is to follow the examples from overseas and have two pieces of legislation; one to provide us with an urban planning framework and a second to protect our precious environment (essentially a non-urban planning framework). This is not a new concept with similar split planning frameworks in Australia and the UK. However as with any legislation changes, the details will be important, and we need to question if a new legislative framework is a right solution.
For years we have heard the issue that development gets held up for resource consents and this adds significant costs and delays to development. But is the RMA to blame for this or is it the way developers and councils work together to achieve positive planning outcomes? With each district responsible for developing its own permitted standards, residential subdivision and urban development are limited by the expectations created through the provisions of the district plan. As community documents, district plans are subject to public scrutiny, and alterations. This means competing interests can push our planning documents in different directions resulting in rules that hinder streamlined land development. Equally the RMA now focuses more on developers having all the aspects of their development covered off before they lodge their resource consents, front loading the information and cost in the process. This occurs with variable success depending on the attitude or knowledge of the developer and the council’s willingness or availability to work with developers before the resource consent processing clock is ticking.
In terms of our wider environmental concerns a new planning framework that deals with how we farm, harvest forestry, manage our waterways and care for our forests sounds amazing, but the same issues of conflict between rural commercial interests and maintaining our pristine environments will still exist. Any new legislation will be challenged with finding a way to ensure the environmental bottom lines are achieved and balancing this with the need to enable primary production and development to occur. Simply imposing costs on land owners to achieve compliance with the new legislation will not enable progress in our primary sector.
Any new planning legislation will need to be aware that any requirement to seek consents, commission a report, or ask for public input in a user pays system will place additional costs on landowners and developers. This will not reduce the red tape, the hassle or the frustration felt by these users, it will simply create a new system to learn, new hoops to jump through, and new legislation to complain about at each election. Developing now under the RMA may be a preferable option than under a post-election unknown planning framework.
Articles you might be interested in
- Is it a Wetland or Not?
- Spotlight on District Plan Provisions
- Buildings under exemptions may still need resource consent
- New Indigenous Biodiversity Legislation Mandates Significant Natural Area Identification
- How lizards might affect your new development
- Highly Productive Soils – Big Picture Thinking vs Private Landowners Needs
- Who Shapes our Planning Rules?
- District Plan in Selwyn – How will it Affect You?
- The impact of consent notices when purchasing land
- Land Development opportunities and times of change
- Flood Management | Changes in Selwyn
- Boundary disputes – What are they and how can you resolve them?
- A Practical Guide for District Plan Reviews
- Wild Weather and Resource Consent Requirements
- The dream of subdividing your land
- Rural allotment sizes set to double in West Selwyn
- Your Rights as an Affected Neighbour: Navigating Development Under the RMA
- Rural Allotment Sizes set to Double
- What does The Selwyn District Plan (appeals version) mean for the planning process and consent?
- Burning crop stubble on your property?
- Why we have complicated septic tank disposal rules
- Time's up on the RMA
- Who Pays for Infrastructure in Greenfield Land Development?
- Historic Heritage Challenges for Landowners
- Commercial Activity in a Rural Zone – What’s the Harm?
- RMA changes are coming, are you ready?
- Have your say on Development Projects
- Importance of Sediment Management in Land Development Projects: Simple Techniques for Effective Sediment Runoff Control
- Risks to farmland in the planning framework
- How might Development Contributions affect you?
- The costs of subdividing hitting Selwyn | development contributions
- What to do when you inherit land
- Rivers, Lakes and Coastline, Public Space for All
- Time matters – With Resource Consent
- What does a professional planner do?
- Managing Cultural Heritage Sites
- Hazardous activities, land contamination and resource consent applications
- Make Your Additional Land Profitable Under the Selwyn Proposed Plan
- Planning land use to be resilient to natural hazards
- Changes to Resource Management Planning Signalled in Proposed Legislation
- A recent Baseline Group project was recognised at the 2022 Canterbury Architecture Awards
- How to navigate Rural Land Development Under the National Policy Statement on Highly Productive Soils
- Selwyn District Council Changes Urban Allotment Sizes
- Our History - How We All Play a Part in its Protection
- Outstanding Natural Features and Landscapes - effect on farming
- Confused by Environmental Legislation? You are Not Alone.
- Indigenous Biodiversity: what does it mean for a farmer?
- Housing Intensification – Not for Everyone Says CCC
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan Update
- The rise or fall of rural lifestyle blocks in the Selwyn District?
- Cross lease titles - an overview
- Managing Wastewater in Rural Canterbury: A Guide for Property Owners
- Councils are Increasing Residential Density, but why, who does it benefit?
- The Role of Planning in the Climate Change - Discussion for Agriculture
- Balancing Common Sense and Legal Process under the RMA: Protecting Communities and the Environment
- The importance of knowing your boundaries
- Good District Plan provisions save time and money
- Game changers for housing under the RMA
- Crunch Time For New Freshwater Legislation
- With increasing density, good design matters
- Minimum car parking requirements to be chopped
- State highways, noise and reverse sensitivity: what’s the buzz?
- The Role of Planning in Land and Property Development
- Highly Productive Soils – Big Picture Thinking vs Private Landowners Needs
- Tiny Home Revolution May Not Save Costs
- The National Policy Statement for Natural Hazard Decision-Making and its effects on Resource Consents
- Negotiating with Neighbours Under the RMA
- Housing Growth continues in Selwyn with Legislative Support
- What does an activity status mean for your land development?
- Minimum Car Parking Requirements to be Chopped
- Flood Management – An Update
- Planning Permissions – Resource Consent or Plan Change?
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan - What next?
- How Tree Canopies Transform Neighbourhoods and Enhance Lives
- But that’s the way we have always done it!
- Fundamental Culture Shift in New Zealand Planning Legislation.
- Crime Prevention Through Environment Design (CPTED)
- Navigating New Opportunities: The Importance of Land Development Planning in 2024
- Planning Rules can Affect Property Value
- The Great Forestry Debate
- Change isn't coming, it's here!