By Anna Bensemann | Sept 14, 2021
The Proposed Selwyn District Plan includes a number of residential zones including the Large Lot Residential Zone, which has a minimum allotment size of 3000 m². This zone is proposed on the edge of townships to provide a buffer between intensive residential activities and the General Rural Zone. There are large areas around Darfield, Kirwee and West Melton and smaller areas on the periphery of Prebbleton, Lincoln, Leeston, Dunsandel, Southbridge and Rolleston.
The proposed rules are designed to be more consistent and include the usual suspects when it comes to ensuring that you don’t upset the neighbourhood. This includes a maximum building coverage of less than either 500 m² or 20% of the site in question. There are height limits of eight metres, and recession planes apply along boundaries to ensure that buildings fit within a building envelope within the site. These features avoid a site appearing cluttered or having buildings located close to neighbours creating shading or overlook effects. No one wants a massive three-storied house on their boundary looking into their yard.
More interestingly, however, the proposed rules specify boundary setbacks and fencing requirements with the boundary setbacks. Within 10 m of a road boundary or shared access boundary and with 5 m of an internal boundary with a neighbour, fences are only permitted to be 1.2 m in height and must be 50% visually permeable (so trellis, picket fencing or other similar see-through options). Keeping in mind that a hedge meets the definition of a fence, this raises some questions as to what the Council expect to see around the periphery of properties other than open grassed areas.
Fencing in these setback areas are also required to be either post and rail or post and wire fencing along road boundaries, and post and rail, post and wire, tennis court or swimming pool fencing along internal boundaries.
These rules will apply to any new properties and may technically apply whenever you remove a fence to replace it, consistent with existing use rights under the RMA. The patterns of development potentially resulting from these rules is either larger fences located within properties and beyond the setback requirements to create private spaces. This could create areas between properties where there is a no-man’s land of vacant land in between properties, or unfenced properties with reduced security. Post and rail fences do not provide much opportunity to keep pets or children contained within a property and do not give a definitive sense of security.
While more open fencing or no fencing works well in some situations, there is a real concern that this will have an adverse effect on security and may create a double layer of fencing within properties to get around or away from these rule restrictions. If this is of concern, residents with the proposed Large Lot Residential Zone, need to find a way to make a further submission to the Selwyn District Plan to seek changes to the proposed fencing and boundary controls.
Articles you might be interested in
- Cross Lease Titles
- Who Pays for Infrastructure in Greenfield Land Development?
- Planning land use to be resilient to natural hazards
- Who Shapes our Planning Rules?
- How Tree Canopies Transform Neighbourhoods and Enhance Lives
- Have your say on Development Projects
- Why we have complicated septic tank disposal rules
- District Plan in Selwyn – How will it Affect You?
- How to navigate Rural Land Development Under the National Policy Statement on Highly Productive Soils
- What does an activity status mean for your land development?
- A recent Baseline Group project was recognised at the 2022 Canterbury Architecture Awards
- Is it a Wetland or Not?
- Good District Plan provisions save time and money
- Time's up on the RMA
- Minimum car parking requirements to be chopped
- Flood Management – An Update
- Your Rights as an Affected Neighbour: Navigating Development Under the RMA
- RMA changes are coming, are you ready?
- The Taking of Esplanades at the Time of Subdivision
- Rural Allotment Sizes set to Double
- Build-to-Rent Development in New Zealand: A Rising Trend in Housing
- Wild Weather and Resource Consent Requirements
- Importance of Sediment Management in Land Development Projects: Simple Techniques for Effective Sediment Runoff Control
- What to do when you inherit land
- Negotiating with Neighbours Under the RMA
- Balancing Common Sense and Legal Process under the RMA: Protecting Communities and the Environment
- Rivers, Lakes and Coastline, Public Space for All
- How might Development Contributions affect you?
- Understanding Zoning and Density Rules in Selwyn
- What does a professional planner do?
- Minimum Car Parking Requirements to be Chopped
- Planning Permissions – Resource Consent or Plan Change?
- Housing Growth continues in Selwyn with Legislative Support
- Highly Productive Soils – Big Picture Thinking vs Private Landowners Needs
- What does The Selwyn District Plan (appeals version) mean for the planning process and consent?
- Game changers for housing under the RMA
- Back to Basics for the RMA Reforms
- Outstanding Natural Features and Landscapes - effect on farming
- Councils are Increasing Residential Density, but why, who does it benefit?
- Managing Cultural Heritage Sites
- Crunch Time For New Freshwater Legislation
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan Update
- The Role of Planning in Land and Property Development
- Boundary disputes – What are they and how can you resolve them?
- Tiny Homes and Granny Flats
- Submissions to a Resource Consent by Affected Parties
- The Great Forestry Debate
- Time matters – With Resource Consent
- Hazardous activities, land contamination and resource consent applications
- Indigenous Biodiversity: what does it mean for a farmer?
- Historic Heritage Challenges for Landowners
- Our History - How We All Play a Part in its Protection
- Change isn't coming, it's here!
- A New Dawn for Granny Flats and Accessory Dwellings
- Selwyn District Council Changes Urban Allotment Sizes
- Burning crop stubble on your property?
- Crime Prevention Through Environment Design (CPTED)
- Changes to Resource Management Planning Signalled in Proposed Legislation
- Buildings under exemptions may still need resource consent
- Make Your Additional Land Profitable Under the Selwyn Proposed Plan
- The National Policy Statement for Natural Hazard Decision-Making and its effects on Resource Consents
- State highways, noise and reverse sensitivity: what’s the buzz?
- Rural allotment sizes set to double in West Selwyn
- What does your zone mean for you and your property?
- The dream of subdividing your land
- How lizards might affect your new development
- But that’s the way we have always done it!
- Cross lease titles - an overview
- The rise or fall of rural lifestyle blocks in the Selwyn District?
- Land Development opportunities and times of change
- The Role of Planning in the Climate Change - Discussion for Agriculture
- Navigating New Opportunities: The Importance of Land Development Planning in 2024
- A Practical Guide for District Plan Reviews
- Subdividing – The Basics
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan - What next?
- New Indigenous Biodiversity Legislation Mandates Significant Natural Area Identification
- Going for housing growth, to improve housing affordability
- Flood Management | Changes in Selwyn
- Is the RMA really the problem?
- The importance of knowing your boundaries
- Confused by Environmental Legislation? You are Not Alone.
- With increasing density, good design matters
- The costs of subdividing hitting Selwyn | development contributions
- Housing Intensification – Not for Everyone Says CCC
- Risks to farmland in the planning framework
- Managing Wastewater in Rural Canterbury: A Guide for Property Owners
- Fundamental Culture Shift in New Zealand Planning Legislation.
- Commercial Activity in a Rural Zone – What’s the Harm?
- The impact of consent notices when purchasing land
- Ensuring Compliance with Resource Management Laws
- Tiny Home Revolution May Not Save Costs
- Planning Rules can Affect Property Value
- Highly Productive Soils – Big Picture Thinking vs Private Landowners Needs