By Anna Bensemann | Sept 14, 2021
The Proposed Selwyn District Plan includes a number of residential zones including the Large Lot Residential Zone, which has a minimum allotment size of 3000 m². This zone is proposed on the edge of townships to provide a buffer between intensive residential activities and the General Rural Zone. There are large areas around Darfield, Kirwee and West Melton and smaller areas on the periphery of Prebbleton, Lincoln, Leeston, Dunsandel, Southbridge and Rolleston.
The proposed rules are designed to be more consistent and include the usual suspects when it comes to ensuring that you don’t upset the neighbourhood. This includes a maximum building coverage of less than either 500 m² or 20% of the site in question. There are height limits of eight metres, and recession planes apply along boundaries to ensure that buildings fit within a building envelope within the site. These features avoid a site appearing cluttered or having buildings located close to neighbours creating shading or overlook effects. No one wants a massive three-storied house on their boundary looking into their yard.
More interestingly, however, the proposed rules specify boundary setbacks and fencing requirements with the boundary setbacks. Within 10 m of a road boundary or shared access boundary and with 5 m of an internal boundary with a neighbour, fences are only permitted to be 1.2 m in height and must be 50% visually permeable (so trellis, picket fencing or other similar see-through options). Keeping in mind that a hedge meets the definition of a fence, this raises some questions as to what the Council expect to see around the periphery of properties other than open grassed areas.
Fencing in these setback areas are also required to be either post and rail or post and wire fencing along road boundaries, and post and rail, post and wire, tennis court or swimming pool fencing along internal boundaries.
These rules will apply to any new properties and may technically apply whenever you remove a fence to replace it, consistent with existing use rights under the RMA. The patterns of development potentially resulting from these rules is either larger fences located within properties and beyond the setback requirements to create private spaces. This could create areas between properties where there is a no-man’s land of vacant land in between properties, or unfenced properties with reduced security. Post and rail fences do not provide much opportunity to keep pets or children contained within a property and do not give a definitive sense of security.
While more open fencing or no fencing works well in some situations, there is a real concern that this will have an adverse effect on security and may create a double layer of fencing within properties to get around or away from these rule restrictions. If this is of concern, residents with the proposed Large Lot Residential Zone, need to find a way to make a further submission to the Selwyn District Plan to seek changes to the proposed fencing and boundary controls.
Articles you might be interested in
- Risks to farmland in the planning framework
- The National Policy Statement for Natural Hazard Decision-Making and its effects on Resource Consents
- Planning Permissions – Resource Consent or Plan Change?
- A recent Baseline Group project was recognised at the 2022 Canterbury Architecture Awards
- Housing Intensification – Not for Everyone Says CCC
- Your Rights as an Affected Neighbour: Navigating Development Under the RMA
- Navigating New Opportunities: The Importance of Land Development Planning in 2024
- With increasing density, good design matters
- Historic Heritage Challenges for Landowners
- Negotiating with Neighbours Under the RMA
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan Update
- Commercial Activity in a Rural Zone – What’s the Harm?
- Build-to-Rent Development in New Zealand: A Rising Trend in Housing
- Rural allotment sizes set to double in West Selwyn
- Make Your Additional Land Profitable Under the Selwyn Proposed Plan
- What does an activity status mean for your land development?
- Who Pays for Infrastructure in Greenfield Land Development?
- Buildings under exemptions may still need resource consent
- Minimum car parking requirements to be chopped
- Crime Prevention Through Environment Design (CPTED)
- Burning crop stubble on your property?
- Going for housing growth, to improve housing affordability
- Managing Wastewater in Rural Canterbury: A Guide for Property Owners
- Planning Rules can Affect Property Value
- What to do when you inherit land
- New Indigenous Biodiversity Legislation Mandates Significant Natural Area Identification
- Planning land use to be resilient to natural hazards
- Highly Productive Soils – Big Picture Thinking vs Private Landowners Needs
- Cross lease titles - an overview
- The impact of consent notices when purchasing land
- Time's up on the RMA
- Hazardous activities, land contamination and resource consent applications
- But that’s the way we have always done it!
- The Taking of Esplanades at the Time of Subdivision
- Highly Productive Soils – Big Picture Thinking vs Private Landowners Needs
- What does your zone mean for you and your property?
- Game changers for housing under the RMA
- Flood Management – An Update
- Our History - How We All Play a Part in its Protection
- Rivers, Lakes and Coastline, Public Space for All
- What does The Selwyn District Plan (appeals version) mean for the planning process and consent?
- Changes to Resource Management Planning Signalled in Proposed Legislation
- The costs of subdividing hitting Selwyn | development contributions
- District Plan in Selwyn – How will it Affect You?
- Fundamental Culture Shift in New Zealand Planning Legislation.
- Confused by Environmental Legislation? You are Not Alone.
- Outstanding Natural Features and Landscapes - effect on farming
- Managing Cultural Heritage Sites
- The dream of subdividing your land
- Indigenous Biodiversity: what does it mean for a farmer?
- Crunch Time For New Freshwater Legislation
- Minimum Car Parking Requirements to be Chopped
- Change isn't coming, it's here!
- Selwyn District Council Changes Urban Allotment Sizes
- Ensuring Compliance with Resource Management Laws
- Tiny Home Revolution May Not Save Costs
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan - What next?
- How Tree Canopies Transform Neighbourhoods and Enhance Lives
- A Practical Guide for District Plan Reviews
- RMA changes are coming, are you ready?
- The Great Forestry Debate
- Importance of Sediment Management in Land Development Projects: Simple Techniques for Effective Sediment Runoff Control
- Rural Allotment Sizes set to Double
- The Role of Planning in the Climate Change - Discussion for Agriculture
- The Role of Planning in Land and Property Development
- How to navigate Rural Land Development Under the National Policy Statement on Highly Productive Soils
- The rise or fall of rural lifestyle blocks in the Selwyn District?
- The importance of knowing your boundaries
- Wild Weather and Resource Consent Requirements
- Who Shapes our Planning Rules?
- How might Development Contributions affect you?
- Councils are Increasing Residential Density, but why, who does it benefit?
- Balancing Common Sense and Legal Process under the RMA: Protecting Communities and the Environment
- Is it a Wetland or Not?
- Land Development opportunities and times of change
- Time matters – With Resource Consent
- Flood Management | Changes in Selwyn
- Good District Plan provisions save time and money
- Boundary disputes – What are they and how can you resolve them?
- State highways, noise and reverse sensitivity: what’s the buzz?
- Is the RMA really the problem?
- Why we have complicated septic tank disposal rules
- How lizards might affect your new development
- Have your say on Development Projects
- What does a professional planner do?
- Housing Growth continues in Selwyn with Legislative Support