By Anna Bensemann, Senior Planner, Baseline Group Marlborough | Jan 23, 2023
Emergency powers under the Resource Management Act (RMA) allow for works to be undertaken without a resource consent in certain circumstances. With the wild weather hitting New Zealand recently, these provisions are sure to be exercised, but Section 330 of the RMA does not provide carte blanche ability to start moving debris or altering waterways by any person who considers there is a risk. The provisions contain key features to control who, and when, emergency powers can be exercised.
Only an Authorised Person may utilise these powers, and this is limited to those who have financial responsibility for public work, local government, an approved requiring authority or network operator (such as power networks), or someone who provides a lifeline utility service defined in the Civil Defence Emergency Management Act. This means farmers concerned about their land who want to start doing works that would normally need a resource consent, are not able to just take action.
The Authorised Person is only allowed to take action if there is an adverse effect on the environment that requires immediate preventative or remedial measures, or a sudden event causing loss of life, injury, or serious damage to property. When clearing debris off roads and away from abutments of bridges, there may have been a requirement for earthworks consents or activities in the beds of rivers or streams under the RMA in normal circumstances. However, if the clearing of such material is necessary to ensure people can continue to access the road safely, particularly if it’s an important access road, an authorised person may be able to undertake works without a resource consent.
Works are limited to only those necessary to deal with the emergency and are not an opportunity to do further preventative works or other works not required for the immediate response. There is not an opportunity to realign a stream, or widen a road that was not necessary to remove the immediate emergency.
After the works are complete the Authorised Person is required to inform the consent authority of the works and to make an application for resource consent for the works. Therefore, Authorised Persons will keep records of the emergency situation, the actions taken and the reasons for the actions during the course of the works, to assist with seeking the retrospective resource consent.
For the everyday landowner the provisions of Section 330 do not offer a clear solution to remediating emergency situations unless they can get authority from their local council to undertake the works as part of the local councils “Authorised Person” status. The risk is undertaking works without the proper authorisations, even during an emergency response, could result in prosecution after the event for actions taken.
Articles you might be interested in
- Managing Cultural Heritage Sites
- What does a professional planner do?
- Is the RMA really the problem?
- Selwyn District Council Changes Urban Allotment Sizes
- District Plan in Selwyn – How will it Affect You?
- Risks to farmland in the planning framework
- The importance of knowing your boundaries
- The dream of subdividing your land
- Minimum Car Parking Requirements to be Chopped
- A Practical Guide for District Plan Reviews
- Hazardous activities, land contamination and resource consent applications
- Times' up on the RMA
- Highly Productive Soils – Big Picture Thinking vs Private Landowners Needs
- Buildings under exemptions may still need resource consent
- Commercial Activity in a Rural Zone – What’s the Harm?
- Game changers for housing under the RMA
- The Role of Planning in the Climate Change - Discussion for Agriculture
- Planning Rules can Affect Property Value
- RMA changes are coming, are you ready?
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan Update
- What to do when you inherit land
- Housing Intensification – Not for Everyone Says CCC
- Have your say on Development Projects
- Planning land use to be resilient to natural hazards
- A recent Baseline Group project was recognised at the 2022 Canterbury Architecture Awards
- Outstanding Natural Features and Landscapes - effect on farming
- How lizards might affect your new development
- But that’s the way we have always done it!
- Crunch Time For New Freshwater Legislation
- Change isn't coming, it's here!
- Negotiating with Neighbours Under the RMA
- Highly Productive Soils – Big Picture Thinking vs Private Landowners Needs
- Is it a Wetland or Not?
- Minimum car parking requirements to be chopped
- Fundamental Culture Shift in New Zealand Planning Legislation.
- Why we have complicated septic tank disposal rules
- Who Pays for Infrastructure in Greenfield Land Development?
- Good District Plan provisions save time and money
- Housing Growth continues in Selwyn with Legislative Support
- Boundary disputes – What are they and how can you resolve them?
- The impact of consent notices when purchasing land
- Indigenous Biodiversity: what does it mean for a farmer?
- How might Development Contributions affect you?
- Spotlight on District Plan Provisions
- Who Shapes our Planning Rules?
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan - What next?
- Rural Allotment Sizes set to Double
- Cross lease titles - an overview
- State highways, noise and reverse sensitivity: what’s the buzz?
- Rural allotment sizes set to double in West Selwyn