By Lisa Perry, Planner, Baseline Group, Christchurch Ph 0800 257 123 E:info@blg.nz | Mar 08, 2024
![Baseline team discussing resource consent](/assets/Team-Photography-May-2022/SGZ2900.jpg)
For most development projects, time is money and a common complaint with Resource Consent is delays. Consent authorities have a duty to avoid unreasonable delays. Not keeping to agreed timeframes under the Resource Management Act (RMA) has implications for applicants and consent authorities alike. For applicants, timeframe over runs can result in cashflow crises and budget blow outs. For consent authorities (Council), a timeframe failure allows applicants to claim refunds on processing fees of up to 50% and may also result in reputational damage if it is a regular occurrence.
Reasonableness; however, is not a science. It is defined by an individual’s beliefs and expectations. To create certainty and consistency around what a reasonable timeframe is, the RMA outlines what is expected and what happens when timeframes are not met.
The “statutory clock” for resource consent applications starts when an application is accepted as complete by Council under s88 of the RMA. An application is complete when: 1) the relevant form has been correctly filled out, 2) enough information describing and assessing the proposed activity has been supplied, and 3) the deposit has been paid. Once accepted, Council has 20 working days to process the application. During those 20 working days, Council can “stop the clock” for various reasons, the most common being an official “Request for Further Information” (or RFI) under s92 of the RMA. The clock starts again when Council receives the further information and is satisfied that it answers the request. If Council exceeds their statutory processing days, applicants are entitled to a discount on fees of 1% per day to a maximum of 50%.
There are times when, for genuine reasons, Council is unable to process an application within 20 working days and Council can extend timeframes under s37 of the RMA. Time limits can be extended by twice the statutory time limit i.e., to 40 working days but only if special circumstances apply (e.g., large and/or complex applications), or the applicant agrees. In deciding to extend a time limit, Council must consider 1) the effect on anyone who may be affected by the extension of time, 2) the benefits to the community of having an adequate assessment of effects of the activity, and 3) Council’s duty to avoid unreasonable delay. Given the above, the decision to extend time limits is not simple. It is a balancing act between an individual’s private property rights, and the community’s right for sustainably managed natural and physical resources, whilst always considering what is reasonable or unreasonable delay.
Whilst applicants do not have power and control over the entire process, applicants are able to make the process smoother and quicker. Applicants can pay their deposit on the due date, and while Council manages their statutory obligations, applicants can ensure their applications are complete with all the relevant information to enable Council to make good decisions. To give your application the greatest chance of success, and avoid delays, engage planning professionals early for guidance.
Articles you might be interested in
- Land Development opportunities and times of change
- Change isn't coming, it's here!
- What does an activity status mean for your land development?
- Planning land use to be resilient to natural hazards
- New Indigenous Biodiversity Legislation Mandates Significant Natural Area Identification
- How might Development Contributions affect you?
- Crunch Time For New Freshwater Legislation
- How to navigate Rural Land Development Under the National Policy Statement on Highly Productive Soils
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan - What next?
- Buildings under exemptions may still need resource consent
- Make Your Additional Land Profitable Under the Selwyn Proposed Plan
- Your Rights as an Affected Neighbour: Navigating Development Under the RMA
- Game changers for housing under the RMA
- Selwyn District Council Changes Urban Allotment Sizes
- The importance of knowing your boundaries
- State highways, noise and reverse sensitivity: what’s the buzz?
- What does a professional planner do?
- District Plan in Selwyn – How will it Affect You?
- Rural allotment sizes set to double in West Selwyn
- Wild Weather and Resource Consent Requirements
- Crime Prevention Through Environment Design (CPTED)
- Changes to Resource Management Planning Signalled in Proposed Legislation
- Is it a Wetland or Not?
- Confused by Environmental Legislation? You are Not Alone.
- Flood Management – An Update
- Is the RMA really the problem?
- Highly Productive Soils – Big Picture Thinking vs Private Landowners Needs
- Boundary disputes – What are they and how can you resolve them?
- Balancing Common Sense and Legal Process under the RMA: Protecting Communities and the Environment
- How lizards might affect your new development
- But that’s the way we have always done it!
- Councils are Increasing Residential Density, but why, who does it benefit?
- Commercial Activity in a Rural Zone – What’s the Harm?
- The dream of subdividing your land
- Highly Productive Soils – Big Picture Thinking vs Private Landowners Needs
- Cross lease titles - an overview
- Tiny Home Revolution May Not Save Costs
- Housing Growth continues in Selwyn with Legislative Support
- What to do when you inherit land
- The Role of Planning in the Climate Change - Discussion for Agriculture
- A recent Baseline Group project was recognised at the 2022 Canterbury Architecture Awards
- Good District Plan provisions save time and money
- Managing Wastewater in Rural Canterbury: A Guide for Property Owners
- Hazardous activities, land contamination and resource consent applications
- What does The Selwyn District Plan (appeals version) mean for the planning process and consent?
- The Role of Planning in Land and Property Development
- Rivers, Lakes and Coastline, Public Space for All
- Housing Intensification – Not for Everyone Says CCC
- The impact of consent notices when purchasing land
- How Tree Canopies Transform Neighbourhoods and Enhance Lives
- Flood Management | Changes in Selwyn
- The National Policy Statement for Natural Hazard Decision-Making and its effects on Resource Consents
- A Practical Guide for District Plan Reviews
- Spotlight on District Plan Provisions
- With increasing density, good design matters
- Rural Allotment Sizes set to Double
- Outstanding Natural Features and Landscapes - effect on farming
- Navigating New Opportunities: The Importance of Land Development Planning in 2024
- The rise or fall of rural lifestyle blocks in the Selwyn District?
- Who Pays for Infrastructure in Greenfield Land Development?
- Our History - How We All Play a Part in its Protection
- Minimum Car Parking Requirements to be Chopped
- Indigenous Biodiversity: what does it mean for a farmer?
- Burning crop stubble on your property?
- The Great Forestry Debate
- Proposed Selwyn District Plan Update
- Who Shapes our Planning Rules?
- Historic Heritage Challenges for Landowners
- Managing Cultural Heritage Sites
- Fundamental Culture Shift in New Zealand Planning Legislation.
- Planning Permissions – Resource Consent or Plan Change?
- Why we have complicated septic tank disposal rules
- Negotiating with Neighbours Under the RMA
- RMA changes are coming, are you ready?
- Planning Rules can Affect Property Value
- Have your say on Development Projects
- Minimum car parking requirements to be chopped
- The costs of subdividing hitting Selwyn | development contributions
- Importance of Sediment Management in Land Development Projects: Simple Techniques for Effective Sediment Runoff Control
- Risks to farmland in the planning framework
- Time's up on the RMA